Maggie Boyd
October 23, 2019
Maggie Boyd is very hard to take a picture of. Most of us, thanks to iPhones, have learned to stay permanently half-alert to photo opportunities. We’re semi-posed at all times, faces frozen, forever photogenic. Maggie’s fundamental lack of self-consciousness keeps her in motion. Nearly all my photographs of her are blurs: head thrown back in laughter, expression mid-transformation, body exiting the frame. Once, I got a roll of film back and the final image was a double exposure, Maggie on top of Maggie. It’s a picture of pure embodiment: two Maggie’s totally unaware, literally twice as present but actually totally absent, elsewhere, engrossed. I felt as if my camera had shoved two pictures of her together in desperation. If I fail again and again to keep Maggie’s attention when I’m taking her picture, the camera does ultimately “capture her” — any photo of Maggie shows her absorbed by the real world, oblivious to the eyes on her, telling something of her true self, that totally present person.
Maggie is a ceramicist; her work electrifies and delights. The pieces she produces en masse are the mundane made magic, sometimes manic: bowls, cups, and planters in familiar shapes painted daffy colors, drawn on, scratched out, and scribbled with. Her best-known series involves bodies: naked, female, writhing, reclining, giving birth, bleeding, being all kinds of things, none of which you typically find depicted on your coffee mug. They are called “Demoiselles d’Havingnoneofit” (a play on Picasso’s famous “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon”), “Freebleeding Sur l’Herbe,” “The Birthing Demoiselles,” and “Lady Lounging on the Sea Using the Sun as Her Pillow.” They are funny and they are straightforward, in the same way that Maggie is. Her ceramic work, the small pieces and the bigger sculptures she exhibits in galleries, all seem to say, “I am here, I’m a body, aren’t you?,” a simple message that lately feels more urgent than ever.
This year, Maggie had a baby. We met right before she got pregnant, so I got to watch as she modified her studio overalls with first one safety pin, then three, to stretch over her growing bump. Tuli was born in June; he’s perfect. The birth, though, was complicated and harrowing. To detail her experience and update friends and family, she drew an annotated map of her own body postpartum. That picture was the inspiration for our interview format here, a collage of drawn self-portraits and text. I was stunned by the grace and generosity with which Maggie handled a terrifying experience. Her illustrations, both the kind she puts on her ceramics and the self-portrait she made after giving birth, are gifts that remind us all we are bodies first — that we can be truly embodied if we try and in connection to our bodies we can find freedom and a lot of fun. It’s no small thing to share so intimately and reflexively in this day and age. I’m so grateful that Maggie is here to show us how.
Georgia Hilmer: Where did you grow up? How did that place shape you?
Maggie Boyd: I grew up in Canada and I moved quite a bit between small forestry towns in British Columbia. It seems that what did a lot of the shaping was a particular shapelessness of my childhood — growing up with several different family situations and in many different homes by the time I was 16, I was never under the illusion that things had to look a particular way to fit a definition of home or family or parent, etc. I also think that growing up rurally instilled a love for nature that I didn't really understand until I moved to New York and felt a deep hunger for it.
What was your first experience with ceramics? Has it always been your primary medium?
My first clay experience was making a dinosaur in grade one or two. I remember very clearly pinching the spikes on the back between my finger and thumb and glazing the whole thing a dark forest green — even the eyeballs — and being repulsed and attracted to the shiny green orbs after they came out of the kiln. I remember thinking, "I'm better at this," when I looked around at what the other kids had made, which is an arrogant thought but I was only six so maybe that's fine.
In the first couple of years of studying art I really focused on sharpening my skills in clay and after that I moved into everything but —sound, sculpture, video, performance, installation. All usually had a clay element but I was always neglecting it to some degree because I didn't want to to commit and become what I thought was the inevitable hippie potter. I wanted to be an Artist with a capital A! So obviously the fates made me a hippie potter as punishment for my arrogance.
What was your sense of what “being an artist” meant when you were growing up? Did you have a model for that lifestyle? Where were you seeing art?
They tell me I've been drawing since I could pick up things to draw with, but my family also never really thought or spoke in terms of "art" or "artist" so much. One person I remember being called an artist was my dad's mom who painted landscapes before I was born and the other was mysterious and reclusive Uncle Bruce who lived at the top of Hospital Hill in the Tel-a-Friend Hotel. I'm pretty sure he spent a lot of his life on government assistance dealing with mental health and alcoholism and painting surreal images that no one really got to see. Once I visited him and he showed me one of his canvases inspired by de Chirico and we talked about Shakespeare and though I romanticized the experience, I rarely thought about what an artist was or what art-making was until I found out there was a thing called art school at the end of high school and applied.
When did ceramics and art-making become your full-time job? Before that shift, what other work did you do to support yourself?
I think it happened around 7 years ago now — holy crapola. Before that I had been serving in some capacity at bars, restaurants, and cafes since I was 14 years old.
Did teaching ceramics workshops come naturally to you? Has the experience of explaining and sharing your craft with other people changed your relationship to the work
Oh man it came before I even considered myself qualified — I started teaching more than twelve years ago when I was in my early twenties — but yes, I loved teaching and even then it felt so natural. I could barely stay in school (I dropped out twice) but I was being hired to teach all these workshops and it was really confusing because I was pretty good at it and yet terrible at going to school.
What’s the balance between cup-bowl-vase-making and fine art-making? Do you distinguish between the two? When you aren’t making commissioned works for a show or throwing pieces to sell online, what does your practice look like? Is there time for play?
I guess there are pragmatic distinctions to be made between the vase that is a sculpture and the mug I reproduce for orders or sales in my online shop but in the glowing-amethyst-feeling-energy world of making in the the studio I often don't think in those terms. I know that they are all feeding into each other and can see how one thing takes me to another across the lines of production and art.
Regarding play: I think that most of what I do is routed in play or experimentation. I almost always leave a few things to experiment with in each kiln load to freak myself out with. Always chasing that glossy green eyeball repulsion/obsession feeling from grade two.
What has your recent move from Vancouver to New York revealed about your habits/desires/needs?
In this past year I have learned so much about myself and been humbled over and over and probably most importantly let some ideas go.